Abstract
This research article provides a detailed analysis of the punishments for alcohol consumption, adultery,and slander (Qazf) during the era of the Rightly Guided Caliphs and examines them in a comparative frameworkwith the interpretations and ijtihad of contemporary Islamic jurists. During the period of the Rightly GuidedCaliphs, the limits prescribed by Shariah were not only clear and strict but were also intended to ensure socialdiscipline, moral training, judicial transparency, and the protection of human dignity. The prohibition of alcohol,the punishments for adultery, and the strict evidentiary requirements in cases of slander formed the foundation ofjudicial and social policies of that era. Their enforcement promoted fear of God, justice, and moral upbringing insociety.The study also highlights that contemporary jurists, while preserving the spirit of classical limits, haveprovided ijtihadi interpretations suitable for addressing complex social, legal, and ethical issues of the presentera. Modern scholars suggest that in the implementation of punishments for alcohol, adultery, and slander,flexibility, consideration of social conditions, and respect for human rights should be taken into account. In thisway, Islamic limits can be harmonized with contemporary judicial systems, international laws, and human rightsstandards, ensuring justice, morality, and peace in society.The comparative analysis of classical policies andcontemporary jurisprudence indicates that while the principled stability of Islamic law is maintained, practicalimplementation is possible through ijtihad. This review also shows that Shariah is not merely a legal code but apractical and flexible system that promotes social balance, moral development, and judicial justice. Furthermore,ijtihadi interpretations have the capacity to implement Islamic limits effectively, ethically, and practically inaccordance with contemporary global challenges, international laws, and social circumstances.This studycritically examines historical and contemporary jurisprudential sources, including Hadith, Quranic verses,classical fatwas, and modern fiqh literature, providing an academic foundation for understanding how the limitson alcohol, adultery, and slander in Islamic law remain effective in promoting social justice, judicial transparency,and ethical conduct across eras.